Bloomberg.com: Renewable energy costs spark debate in US policy
Photo by Viktor Friesen on Unsplash
The Bloomberg analysis argues both sides are wrong regarding renewable energy's economic impact in American energy policy. While environmental advocates argue renewables are cheapest due to declining costs, others like Energy Secretary Chris Wright claim renewables raise system costs due to reliability issues.
Stay updated on stories like this
Key takeaways
- A Bloomberg analysis suggests that the ongoing debate regarding the economic impact of renewable energy in American energy policy is a "case where both sides have it wrong
- " The article examines two opposing viewpoints
- Environmental advocates, such as Bill McKibben, argue that renewable energy sources are the most economical option, citing the declining costs of wind turbines and photovoltaic panels as evidence that solar and wind power are now the cheapest forms of energy
Related Topics
Never miss stories like this
Verified mention available
Is this your company?
Set up real-time alerts and keep your Heartspace News coverage accurate. Verified teams can update profiles, request corrections, and collaborate on future stories.